Harry lingers like bad spell
STEPHEN APPLEBAUM, The West Australian, May 17, 2012
The first time I saw Daniel Radcliffe, he was a wide-eyed
11-year-old at a press conference for the first Harry Potter film. Eight
excursions into J.K. Rowling's world of wizards and muggles later, he
has emerged from the franchise a young man, ready to move on to other
projects. But are cinemagoers prepared for a post-Potter Radcliffe, or
will he be forever stuck in the hallways of Hogwarts in people's minds?
On
stage, in London and on Broadway, he convinced critics that he has more
to offer (I'm not referring to his full-frontal nude scene) with his
powerful performance as a teenager who blinds horses, in a production of
Peter Shaffer's controversial psychosexual drama, Equus.
If the
American notices for his recent all-singing, all-dancing turn in the
musical How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying were more
warmly encouraging than rave, most reviewers at least agreed that his
desire to stretch himself was admirable. The question is: can he now
sell himself to film audiences as something other than Harry?
His
first outing - a brilliantly executed spin on Susan Hill's chilling
ghost story, The Woman in Black, from Britain's newly revived Hammer
studio - hasn't persuaded everyone, despite strong box-office takings in
the UK and US.
But only churlish viewers would deny that he brings gravitas and darkness to his portrayal of widowed father Arthur Kipps.
Radcliffe
is well aware he still has people to win over. However, meeting him in
the flesh, you realise just how good a job he does in the film. On the
brink of suicide when we first encounter him, it is as if bereavement
has turned Kipps, a lawyer, into a living dead man.
"What was
universal in all the people I talked to about loss, and about serious
depression, was just how physically tired you are," Radcliffe says. "So
that's where I started with Arthur, in a place of deep physical
fatigue."
The film's director, James Watkins (Eden Lake), wanted
him to move slowly and evoke a sense of stillness, requiring the actor
to temper the "excitable energy" that he says, laughingly, has got him
through life. "That's my thing. But James was very keen to deaden
that."
Kipps hasn't been able to move on from his wife's death,
and his battle with the ghostly Woman in Black - a kind of angel of
death wreaking havoc on the children of a small English village - is
essentially a battle for closure, for both of them. It could almost be a
metaphor for Radcliffe's own bid to move on from Potter - something he
believes would have been tougher were it not for Equus, and the way his
performance was received.
"I have days when I go 'Am I going to
be able to separate myself in a legitimate, credible way from Harry?'"
he says. "Then I think 'God, but how much harder it would have been if I
was starting to try that now'."
He has come to believe that Equus
is the most important thing he has ever done. "It made people sit up
and go 'Oh, he's interested in and willing to take risks, and he's
committed'. Even directors who didn't see it . . . it has made a huge
difference to how they saw me."
With a reported personal fortune
of around $84 million, Radcliffe, 22, need never work again. Instead,
though, he talks excitedly about the freedom that the money - "which is
weird because I don't know what to do with it, and nobody does, and
nobody would" - gives him to try "interesting projects". It means he can
afford to risk falling on his backside because he doesn't have to worry
financially, "which is the greatest liberation".
The most impressive thing about Radcliffe, arguably, is just how well adjusted and grounded he appears to be.
The
money and fame could easily have turned him into a spoilt monster, but
he is polite and chatty, and doesn't yet show signs of being jaded. He
has earned himself a reputation as a hard worker and is very
self-critical, which, he admits, can sometimes be a problem. "There is a
thin line between self-critical and self-hating, and I go back and
forth," he says candidly.
Last year he revealed how he had become
"reliant on alcohol" - he no longer drinks - while filming Harry Potter
and the Half-Blood Prince in 2009. Today, he finds watching the film,
the sixth in the series, difficult. "I look back at it and go 'That is
the performance of a complacent, lazy actor'," he says. "I see myself as
not having given everything. I was unhappy in my own life and that
comes across on film."
Really? "Maybe other people don't see it
because they weren't there but I can't watch that film without going
'No, you should've been better than that. It's a missed opportunity.'"
He
is more relaxed about his fame, something he ascribes to having had six
years to ease himself into it surrounded by the same people, rather
than having it suddenly thrust upon him like what happened to Robert
Pattinson after the first Twilight film.
"People compare us a lot
and I say 'No, Rob actually had it a lot harder'." Radcliffe says. "To
suddenly get huge fame at that age is totally different from getting it
at the age of 11 and having time to prepare yourself for the idea of
growing up into it. I can't imagine that."
Far from complaining
about his celebrity, he confesses to getting a kick out of the attention
it gets him from girls. When Japanese fans faint, as they've been
known to do, "You just go 'How weird is my life. That's hilarious,'" he
chuckles. When he waved back at a pretty girl in the audience for How to
Succeed and she went "mental", he loved it. "I may, at best, have that
for another 10 years. So while you can do that, you should enjoy it. I
know I'm nothing special. But she thinks I am, and that's funny."
What does his partner, Rosie Coker, think about this? "She finds it funny too, thankfully. She knows I'm a big flirt."
A tolerant girlfriend, a pile in the bank - Daniel Radcliffe's life really is magic.
First published in The West Australian, May 17, 2012
First published in The West Australian, May 17, 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be civil